{"id":8095,"date":"2020-01-29T12:50:42","date_gmt":"2020-01-29T19:50:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/?p=8095"},"modified":"2020-01-29T12:50:42","modified_gmt":"2020-01-29T19:50:42","slug":"continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/","title":{"rendered":"CONTINUING GARNISHMENT V. GARNISHING AMOUNTS DUE"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Stephen J. Muhonen<\/a>, Creditor\u2019s Rights \/ Collections Attorney, Racine Olson, PLLP<\/p>\n

I had an interesting collections issue arise the other day that is worth discussing.\u00a0 A self-represented judgment creditor was attempting to garnish a judgment debtor\u2019s wages.\u00a0 The judgment creditor had repeatedly served a Writ of Continuing Garnishment on the judgment debtor\u2019s employer, just to have the writ returned each time, unsatisfied. \u00a0The judgment creditor was naturally frustrated because they had expended a considerable amount of emotional energy, time, effort and expense in the repeated attempts to collect upon the judgment; all for naught.<\/p>\n

As I listened and the related facts unfolded, the reason as to why the Writ of Continuing Garnishment was not being accepted became apparent.\u00a0 There were two problems.\u00a0 One (1), the judgment debtor was not an employee, but rather, an independent contractor.\u00a0 Two (2), because the judgment debtor was an independent contractor, a Writ of Continuous Garnishment was the improper mechanism to garnish the amounts due to the independent contractor, from the independent contractor\u2019s creditor.<\/p>\n

Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Stephen J. Muhonen, Creditor\u2019s Rights \/ Collections Attorney, Racine Olson, PLLP I had an interesting collections issue arise the other day that is worth discussing.\u00a0 A self-represented judgment creditor was attempting to garnish a judgment debtor\u2019s wages.\u00a0 The judgment creditor had repeatedly served a Writ of Continuing Garnishment on the judgment debtor\u2019s employer, just […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bankruptcy-creditor-rights"],"yoast_head":"\nCONTINUING GARNISHMENT V. GARNISHING AMOUNTS DUE — Idaho Law Blog — January 29, 2020<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"By Stephen J. Muhonen, Creditor\u2019s Rights \/ Collections Attorney, Racine Olson, PLLP I had an interesting collections issue arise the other day that is — January 29, 2020\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"CONTINUING GARNISHMENT V. GARNISHING AMOUNTS DUE — Idaho Law Blog — January 29, 2020\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"By Stephen J. Muhonen, Creditor\u2019s Rights \/ Collections Attorney, Racine Olson, PLLP I had an interesting collections issue arise the other day that is — January 29, 2020\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Racine Olson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CONTINUING GARNISHMENT V. GARNISHING AMOUNTS DUE — Idaho Law Blog — January 29, 2020","description":"By Stephen J. Muhonen, Creditor\u2019s Rights \/ Collections Attorney, Racine Olson, PLLP I had an interesting collections issue arise the other day that is — January 29, 2020","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"CONTINUING GARNISHMENT V. GARNISHING AMOUNTS DUE — Idaho Law Blog — January 29, 2020","twitter_description":"By Stephen J. Muhonen, Creditor\u2019s Rights \/ Collections Attorney, Racine Olson, PLLP I had an interesting collections issue arise the other day that is — January 29, 2020","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Racine Olson","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/"},"author":{"name":"Racine Olson","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aa8aa04699b3ee65fb6e3d91aaa6b2bd"},"headline":"CONTINUING GARNISHMENT V. GARNISHING AMOUNTS DUE","datePublished":"2020-01-29T19:50:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/"},"wordCount":553,"articleSection":["Bankruptcy & Creditor Rights"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/","url":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/","name":"CONTINUING GARNISHMENT V. GARNISHING AMOUNTS DUE — Idaho Law Blog — January 29, 2020","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-01-29T19:50:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aa8aa04699b3ee65fb6e3d91aaa6b2bd"},"description":"By Stephen J. Muhonen, Creditor\u2019s Rights \/ Collections Attorney, Racine Olson, PLLP I had an interesting collections issue arise the other day that is — January 29, 2020","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/continuing-garnishment-v-garnishing-amounts-due\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CONTINUING GARNISHMENT V. GARNISHING AMOUNTS DUE"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/","name":"Idaho Law Blog","description":"Published by Boise Attorneys \u2014 Racine Olson","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aa8aa04699b3ee65fb6e3d91aaa6b2bd","name":"Racine Olson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/195091aa7c1a8d686cee20a0c78fd345b826886ec2fc90ae360e059a7b83e248?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/195091aa7c1a8d686cee20a0c78fd345b826886ec2fc90ae360e059a7b83e248?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/195091aa7c1a8d686cee20a0c78fd345b826886ec2fc90ae360e059a7b83e248?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Racine Olson"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/attorney-profiles.html"]}]}},"yoast":{"focuskw":"","title":"","metadesc":"","linkdex":"","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8095"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8095\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8096,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8095\/revisions\/8096"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}