{"id":5889,"date":"2017-01-02T09:00:02","date_gmt":"2017-01-02T09:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/?p=5889"},"modified":"2017-01-02T09:00:02","modified_gmt":"2017-01-02T09:00:02","slug":"cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/","title":{"rendered":"You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You"},"content":{"rendered":"<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/attorneys\/fred-j-lewis\">By Fred J. Lewis<\/a><\/p>\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In <i>Beascoechea v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation <\/i>decided November 17, 2016 the Claimant was found to be 45% disabled inclusive of his 6% permanent partial impairment rating. At the time of the hearing the Claimant was 68 years old and had told everyone he was retired. The Claimant had Dr. Mary Barros-Bailey PhD. testify on his behalf. Dr. Barros-Bailey opined that the Claimant was 60% permanent partially disabled if the Claimant did not return to work for the pre-injury employer and astonishing enough, testified that if the Claimant did return to work that there would be no loss of labor market access, and wage loss, therefore no disability. Dr. Barros-Bailey was the only expert that testified in the case. It is astonishing that the Claimant was awarded any disability at all in this case given the following:<\/p>\n<ol><\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li>The employer had offered a job to the Claimant and was willing to accommodate his restrictions.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div class=\"read_more_link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/\"  title=\"Continue Reading You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Fred J. Lewis In Beascoechea v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation decided November 17, 2016 the Claimant was found to be 45% disabled inclusive of his 6% permanent partial impairment rating. At the time of the hearing the Claimant was 68 years old and had told everyone he was retired. The Claimant had Dr. Mary [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-workers-comp"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You|Racine Olson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"By Fred J. Lewis In Beascoechea v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation decided November 17, 2016 the Claimant was found to be 45% disabled inclusive &#8212; January 2, 2017\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You|Racine Olson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"By Fred J. Lewis In Beascoechea v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation decided November 17, 2016 the Claimant was found to be 45% disabled inclusive &#8212; January 2, 2017\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Racine Olson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You|Racine Olson","description":"By Fred J. Lewis In Beascoechea v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation decided November 17, 2016 the Claimant was found to be 45% disabled inclusive &#8212; January 2, 2017","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You|Racine Olson","twitter_description":"By Fred J. Lewis In Beascoechea v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation decided November 17, 2016 the Claimant was found to be 45% disabled inclusive &#8212; January 2, 2017","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Racine Olson","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/"},"author":{"name":"Racine Olson","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aa8aa04699b3ee65fb6e3d91aaa6b2bd"},"headline":"You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You","datePublished":"2017-01-02T09:00:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/"},"wordCount":371,"articleSection":["Workers Compensation"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/","url":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/","name":"You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You|Racine Olson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-01-02T09:00:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aa8aa04699b3ee65fb6e3d91aaa6b2bd"},"description":"By Fred J. Lewis In Beascoechea v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation decided November 17, 2016 the Claimant was found to be 45% disabled inclusive &#8212; January 2, 2017","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/cannot-prove-total-permanent-disability-vocational-expert-not-support\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/","name":"Idaho Law Blog","description":"Published by Boise Attorneys \u2014 Racine Olson","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aa8aa04699b3ee65fb6e3d91aaa6b2bd","name":"Racine Olson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/195091aa7c1a8d686cee20a0c78fd345b826886ec2fc90ae360e059a7b83e248?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/195091aa7c1a8d686cee20a0c78fd345b826886ec2fc90ae360e059a7b83e248?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/195091aa7c1a8d686cee20a0c78fd345b826886ec2fc90ae360e059a7b83e248?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Racine Olson"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/attorney-profiles.html"]}]}},"yoast":{"focuskw":"","title":"You Cannot Prove a Total Permanent Disability if Your Vocational Expert Does Not Support You|Racine Olson","metadesc":"","linkdex":"","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5889\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}