{"id":5760,"date":"2016-11-28T09:00:51","date_gmt":"2016-11-28T09:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/?p=5760"},"modified":"2016-11-28T09:00:51","modified_gmt":"2016-11-28T09:00:51","slug":"thats-story-im-sticking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/","title":{"rendered":"That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/attorneys\/fred-j-lewis\">Fred Lewis<\/a><\/p>\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\">In <i>Chadwick, VA. Multi-state Electric, LLC. <\/i>159 Idaho 451 (2015) the Idaho Supreme Court held that the Claimant had failed to prove that the May 26<sup>th<\/sup>, 2012 caused damage to the physical structure of the body and the Claimant had failed to give the employer timely notice of the alleged accident. The Supreme Court pointed out the record was filled with inconsistent evidence from the Claimant in his medical records, recorded statement and deposition in regard to both of his alleged accidents. <\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">But the Idaho Supreme Court held that notice requires notice of and injury and notice that the injury was caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of employment. Notice to the employer that the employee is experiencing pain or that the employee has received treatment for that pain, is insufficient to meet the notice requirement, since injury is defined as &#8220;a personal injury caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of any employment covered by the Workers\u2019 Compensation law&#8221;. &#8220;Injury&#8221; and &#8220;accident&#8221; are not synonymous, notice must be of both, and injury and the cause of the injury.<\/p>\n<div class=\"read_more_link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/\"  title=\"Continue Reading That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Fred Lewis In Chadwick, VA. Multi-state Electric, LLC. 159 Idaho 451 (2015) the Idaho Supreme Court held that the Claimant had failed to prove that the May 26th, 2012 caused damage to the physical structure of the body and the Claimant had failed to give the employer timely notice of the alleged accident. The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5760","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-workers-comp"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It|Racine Olson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"By Fred Lewis In Chadwick, VA. Multi-state Electric, LLC. 159 Idaho 451 (2015) the Idaho Supreme Court held that the Claimant had failed to prove that the &#8212; November 28, 2016\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It|Racine Olson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"By Fred Lewis In Chadwick, VA. Multi-state Electric, LLC. 159 Idaho 451 (2015) the Idaho Supreme Court held that the Claimant had failed to prove that the &#8212; November 28, 2016\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Racine Olson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It|Racine Olson","description":"By Fred Lewis In Chadwick, VA. Multi-state Electric, LLC. 159 Idaho 451 (2015) the Idaho Supreme Court held that the Claimant had failed to prove that the &#8212; November 28, 2016","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It|Racine Olson","twitter_description":"By Fred Lewis In Chadwick, VA. Multi-state Electric, LLC. 159 Idaho 451 (2015) the Idaho Supreme Court held that the Claimant had failed to prove that the &#8212; November 28, 2016","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Racine Olson","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/"},"author":{"name":"Racine Olson","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aa8aa04699b3ee65fb6e3d91aaa6b2bd"},"headline":"That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It","datePublished":"2016-11-28T09:00:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/"},"wordCount":372,"articleSection":["Workers Compensation"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/","url":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/","name":"That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It|Racine Olson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-11-28T09:00:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aa8aa04699b3ee65fb6e3d91aaa6b2bd"},"description":"By Fred Lewis In Chadwick, VA. Multi-state Electric, LLC. 159 Idaho 451 (2015) the Idaho Supreme Court held that the Claimant had failed to prove that the &#8212; November 28, 2016","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/thats-story-im-sticking\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/","name":"Idaho Law Blog","description":"Published by Boise Attorneys \u2014 Racine Olson","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aa8aa04699b3ee65fb6e3d91aaa6b2bd","name":"Racine Olson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/195091aa7c1a8d686cee20a0c78fd345b826886ec2fc90ae360e059a7b83e248?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/195091aa7c1a8d686cee20a0c78fd345b826886ec2fc90ae360e059a7b83e248?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/195091aa7c1a8d686cee20a0c78fd345b826886ec2fc90ae360e059a7b83e248?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Racine Olson"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/attorney-profiles.html"]}]}},"yoast":{"focuskw":"","title":"That\u2019s My Story, And I\u2019m Sticking To It|Racine Olson","metadesc":"","linkdex":"","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5760","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5760"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5760\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinelaw.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}